Back to Home
I wish my life was boring.

Site5 Troubles, or: Watch Me Abuse Emphasised Text

So, I signed up with a Site5 reseller account a few weeks ago. Since then I’ve had to submit three help tickets and there’s another issue I need fixed, but the issue I’m currently battling them on has made me severely doubt tech support’s reading comprehension.

First issue was that in my welcome email they sent me the wrong nameservers and they took a fairly long time to give me the actual ones after I sent in a support ticket.

Second issue was that the FTP wasn’t working for any of the accounts I had set up so the faulty nameservers wouldn’t have made a bit of difference anyway since there was no way I could upload thousands of files via file manager.

Third issue: Someone I host needs domain.com/icons/ and icons.domain.com/icons/ to show what she actually has uploaded in those directories to keep her links alive versus a listing of Apache icons (which you can see demonstrated here if you’re unfamiliar with what I’m talking about1). The subdomain, icons.domain.com, shows what she has uploaded to the icons directory, but domain.com/icons/ does not and neither does icons.domain.com/icons/.

I read in the Site5 Forums that they have been able to change this in a case-by-case basis. I explain very simply what is needed. I even include links. They email me to say:

Hi,

I’m able to access http://domain.com/icons/ without any problems. Are you still unable to access it? What is the error that you get?

I said nothing about errors in my original ticket. I even specifically said that when I access it it’s a directory listing of Apache icons and how that’s not what is needed.

I just ended up explaining to tech support how Apache servers work. I should be on their payroll.

I wake up this morning to this lovely message:

Hello,

What you can do is to create a symbolic link for the /icons folder. That way both icons.domain.com/icons and domain.com/icons will show the exact same content.

Please let us know if you have questions.

Dude, that’s like the exact opposite of what I want. Why would I want to do that?! I want it to display what’s actually uploaded to them, not display the exact same content2.

And why would they just say ‘create a symbolic link’? How many people emailing technical support will actually know what they mean by that? Just because I understand why /icons/ displays what it does doesn’t necessarily mean I’ll know the ins and outs of .htaccess. It mostly means that I’ve been messing around with different servers for the past eight years and have seen a lot of different hosting and server situations. It also means I am a master Google-ninja extraordinaire so if I don’t understand something, I’ll just fucking Google it before I ask questions.

Does someone have good stories about Site5 and/or Site5′s support? Because right now I’m about ready to rip out my hair and I paid for an entire year in advance to save myself $100USD and because everyone says they’re so great.

Update: Partial victory! Apparently they understood enough to enable domain.com/icons/ which is good…except for the part where I said at least three times that domain.com/icons/ could be lived without and icons.domain.com/icons/ was what we were really looking for. I’m hoping it won’t be too difficult to get that enabled, but I’m not getting my hopes up. ;)

  1. In that directory I actually have a file called rss.png uploaded and nothing else, but you won’t see rss.png at all, much less be able to link to it from elsewhere, like what she needs.
  2. Which it’s already doing, technically speaking, since both are displaying ugly Apache icons used for FancyIndexing.

21 Comments

21 Comments

  1. Rachael says:

    Awh man, I’m so sorry to hear that you’re having trouble with Site5! I’ve been with them since July and had nothing but good service…

    Sometimes the forums are more helpful than the support tickets.

  2. Donna says:

    Seriously! I try to avoid contacting support whenever I can unless it’s something only they can fix or change which the /icons/ debacle is, sadly. I’m sort of dreading their reply to my latest email because I can’t imagine what crap they’re going to suggest now.

    I want to like them, I do! My other support tickets came with very good results, if a bit slow. I can deal with slow. ‘Slow’ is far better than ‘repeatedly stupid’.

    If I can’t deal with stupidity from tech support, I should probably never work in it because my brain would probably explode. ;) Both of my parents are techs, my dad specialising in large-scale network administration, so I’ve heard all the horror stories. I’m considering buying my dad a RTFM and/or a ‘It’s a user error’ shirt.

  3. Jem says:

    I don’t know how you managed to end up with the wrong nameservers because the same generic welcome email gets sent to everyone, which includes the info like nameservers… bit odd that!

    I remember when I first had my own hosting, it took me hours to figure out why my icons directory wasn’t showing what I’d uploaded. Hehe. (Sorry, vaguely related trip down memory lane there!)

    I’ve had good days and bad days with Site5 support but overall my experiences have averaged out as more good, and I can’t find anyone that matches their uptime so I stick with them. I use them for work too. I hope you give them the opportunity to prove themselves :)

  4. Donna says:

    Me either! They sent me ns1-servername.webserversystems.com and ns2-servername.webserversystems.com and neglected to mention which server I was on (which I know now is Durga).

    Oh, the same for me! Luckily I google nearly everything though it’s a bit difficult to google about the icons directory if you don’t know it’s an Apache server thing.

    I’m definitely going to give them a chance–mostly because I prepaid a year in advance and I’m looking for the uptime vs. other aspects. I’m not generally a person who has to contact support much which is why it’s odd I’ve had to do so three times in a couple weeks. Hopefully my future dealings with them will go a bit more smoothly.

    Right now I’m almost tempted to tell my hostee there’s nothing I can do about the icons directory, except I’ve read in a couple of their forums post that they’ve changed this before on request.

  5. pajamasam70 says:

    your layout sucks so much dick you don’t even know and you did not know you have to suck did to get them to help you EVERYBODY knows that

  6. Donna says:

    I’m not exactly sure what the above comment says, but I suggest someone either read my ‘about’ page or the top of my sidebar before accusing me of sucking male bits.

    Beyond that, all I have to say is this: lulz, motherfucker.

    EDIT: I was wondering how this, erm, creature even found me and then I realised it must be either Barbie or one of Barbie’s minions (read: sockpuppets) as I commented on Vera’s unrequested review of Mystical Drama.

  7. pajamasam70 says:

    i don’t know who the fuck barbie is faggot yes your a faggot and yet you feel the need to think i read any of your shit may bee if you wiped the pussy juice off your lip and see that dick rules the world …
    if it was not for did you would not be here slut

  8. Donna says:

    Wow. Someone’s…a particularly special sort of stupid.

    Your logic is faulty, but that’s not exactly shocking. Dude, if you haven’t yet realised, you need both bits for procreation.

    Sincerely,
    Faggot

  9. Vera says:

    I love e-mailing tech support. I can be as geeky as I want. Thankfully though, they have always been very helpful to me up until now. I guess I’m just lucky.

    In regards to pajamasam70, Barbi was complaining on her tagboard about a certain pajamasam harassing her, saying that she finally called the cops. And that was before I posted the unrequested review.

    I’m assuming then, that pajamasam’s comment on my blog is related to you? I looked at it before coming here and didn’t get what he/she wanted from me.

  10. pajamasam70 says:

    Wow. Someone’s…a particularly special sort of stupid.

    Your logic is faulty, but that’s not exactly shocking. Dude, if you haven’t yet realized, you need both bits for procreation.

    Sincerely,
    Faggot

    and there for you not a woman and will never be a real woman …
    a real woman will suck dick , love dick , have babys by dick …. you you are a wast of your fathers sperm

  11. pajamasam70 says:

    lolz you are a waste of your fathers sperm faggot

  12. Donna says:

    G-d, someone’s obsessed with cock and not in a usual way.

    New rule for my blog: We are never again to mention my dad’s sperm. Even if it is to mention how much of a “wast” of it I am.

  13. Kaylee says:

    That support seems really… weak, to say the least. I have no experience with that sort of stuff, unless you count calling companies by phone. They make me hold for so long…

  14. pajamasam70 says:

    I love e-mailing tech support. I can be as geeky as I want. Thankfully though, they have always been very helpful to me up until now. I guess I’m just lucky.

    In regards to pajamasam70, Barbi was complaining on her tagboard about a certain pajamasam harassing her, saying that she finally called the cops. And that was before I posted the unrequested review.

    I’m assuming then, that pajamasam’s comment on my blog is related to you? I looked at it before coming here and didn’t get what he/she wanted from me.

    i want you to suck my dick whore

  15. Donna says:

    I’m assuming then, that pajamasam’s comment on my blog is related to you? I looked at it before coming here and didn’t get what he/she wanted from me.

    Very odd. I’ve never commented on Barbie‘s site and only visited it once so pajamasam must have found me via my comment on your site somehow. I hadn’t even responded to him yet when he left that comment on your site so…I’m really not sure what his deal is.

    I can’t blame Barbie for calling the cops because this guy is clearly mentally unbalanced.

    lolz you are a waste of your fathers sperm faggot

    i want you to suck my dick whore

    Now you’re just repeating yourself. :( I hate unfunny trolls. I like to laugh, people. E-drama is about hilarity and how much amusement it can bring me. Put in a bit more effort!

  16. pajamasam70 says:

    still bitch your a waste of your fathers sperm

  17. Donna says:

    That support seems really… weak, to say the least. I have no experience with that sort of stuff, unless you count calling companies by phone. They make me hold for so long…

    Ah, I’ve never called phone support for anything, I don’t think. Sometimes people have a difficult time understanding me over the phone and I hate the long hold times…

    still bitch your a waste of your fathers sperm

    Yes, yes, waste of sperm, blah blah blah. We get it, okay?

  18. pajamasam70 says:

    and you love to suck pussy
    and can never be a real woman
    and you dont stop you shit with me i will sitck my sick in your moth

  19. Donna says:

    Stop my shit? Who’s harassing whom at their blog? Exactly, pajamasam, exactly.

    I’m not exactly sure what ‘my sick in your moth’ is a euphemism for, but it’s probably hilarious.

  20. Becky says:

    I’ve never used site5, but it must be really frustrating for you having these ‘proffesionals’ not helping atall.
    I’m currently using Surpass hosting, and they are excellent. I had a problem (on a sunday!) so I submited a help ticket and they responded within 30 minutes explaining that the problem was their fault and then giving me all of the info I needed.
    I hope you sort out this problem with Site5 though!

  21. Kiera says:

    Hmmm..interesting. I’ve always only heard good things about site5 from forums and such.

    The hosting company I was with last had horrible customer service. You’d be lucky if they replied to your ticket (with some incompetent answer, mind you) within two days. I don’t have patience like that, especially when I’ve paid them in advance.

Leave a Reply

Line breaks are automatic. Your email address will not be displayed.

Allowed XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>